On December 21, 2020, the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial verdict in Lave v. Charter Communications on a 3-0 vote. Click here for opinion.
January 27, 2020, Torrance, CA - The Rager Law Firm Featured In The Los Angeles & San Francisco Daily Journal Article, 'Fighting The Bully'. Click Here To View Article.
January 15, 2019, Los Angeles, CA - Court Awards Kaiser Employee $1,228,721.96 In Wrongful Termination Case, Represented By Jeffrey Rager. Click Here To View Article.
At The Rager Law Firm we have been successfully prosecuting Kaiser Permanente on behalf of its employees for over 20 years. Rager has successfully litigated countless of wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, and retaliation cases against Kaiser Permanente and its affiliates. He has represented Kaiser Permanente physicians, nurses, and administrators in all types of cases asserting claims for EEOC, FEHA, and DFEH Violations, along with Violations of Health and Safety Code section 1278.5 and Business and Professions Code section 2056.
After having obtained a number of multi-million dollar trial verdicts against Kaiser Permanente, and handled complex cases involving affiliate entities such as Southern California Permanente Medical Group, The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., The Permanente Federation, LLC., and many others, he guarantees satisfaction and the successful outcome of your Kaiser Permanente case.
There are various reasons why employees of Kaiser Permanente in a Los Angeles area may need to file a lawsuit against the company. Throughout the company’s more than 70-year history, there have been many complaints of employment law violations. This includes the following:
Experience. Mr. Rager has litigated against Kaiser for more than two decades. Workers with Kaiser Permanente should not have to worry about being subjected to unfair working conditions or unfair treatment by the employer. This includes unfair treatment by Kaiser Permanente or any of their associated affiliates:
Kaiser Permanente is a large organization and a major employer of people in and around the Los Angeles area. At The Rager Law Firm, we have a thorough understanding of the structure of this organization, their arbitration clauses, and union issues that Kaiser Permanente employees face.
Employees typically need to file a claim with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH), fill out properly, and request a right to sue letter. This should not be handled without an attorney as many employees fail to properly exhaust their administrative remedies.
If you are a Kaiser Permanente employee seeking justice, your best choice is to hire an experienced Los Angeles employment attorney who will be by your side and will fully protect your rights.
Kaiser termination cases can be very difficult and you need an attorney experienced with the Kaiser Permanente entities. This is why you need a Los Angeles employment attorney who will carefully gather all the crucial evidence, including:
Healthcare professionals in California can find protection against retaliation caused by complaints about safety issues or patient care by contacting the following agencies:
If you have been wrongfully terminated or are being retaliated against by Kaiser Permanente, contact The Rager Law Firm today to schedule your initial case evaluation. Jeffrey Rager is dedicated to protecting the rights of Kaiser healthcare workers in Los Angeles and the surrounding areas.
A Jury awarded Dr. Martinucci $11,441,559 against Southern California Permanente Medical Group and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan. Dr. Martinucci proved that the Defendants’ retaliated against him for attempting to improve patient care through uniform radiology procedures.
In 2008, a jury found that Kaiser had a conflict of interest when they reported Dr. Strub to the medical board and then convinced him to call them to represent him in front of the board resulting in the loss of his license.
Dr. Wascher raised 3 primary patient care concerns: (1) There was a lack of timely access to surgery for cancer patients; (2) general surgeons were doing complex cancer cases they were not qualified to perform; (3) there was no comprehensive cancer care program at Kaiser Orange County. In response to his complaints, the jury found that Dr. Wascher was retaliated against defamed.