F
r
e
e

C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
t
i
o
n

BRANNIGAN V. SUTTER HEALTH

  1. Home
  2. Case Results
  3. BRANNIGAN V. SUTTER HEALTH
verdict
verdict Amount$2,108,303
AgainstSutter Health
JurisdictionCalifornia Superior Court

A jury found that Dr. Brannigan was defamed as a result of his advocacy for better patient care. Dr. Brannigan complained about a lack of supplies and substandard care by the attending OB/GYN anesthesiologist.

A jury found that Dr. Brannigan was defamed as a result of his advocacy for better patient care. Dr. Brannigan complained about a lack of supplies and substandard care by the attending OB/GYN anesthesiologist.

More Case Results

MARTINUCCI V. KAISER PERMANENTE

$11,441,559

A Jury awarded Dr. Martinucci $11,441,559 against Southern California Permanente Medical Group and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan. Dr. Martinucci proved that the Defendants’ retaliated against him for attempting to improve patient care through uniform radiology procedures.

View Case

Loftus v. Eisenhower Medical Center

$8,552,049.21

Loftus v. Eisenhower Medical Center $8,552,049.21

View Case

STRUB V. KAISER PERMANENTE

$3,949,580

A jury found that Kaiser had a conflict of interest when they reported Dr. Strub to the medical board and then concurrently represented him in front of the same medical board resulting in the loss of his license.

View Case
View All Case Results

tell us what happened...Start your free, no obligation, case evaluation below:

Los Angeles: (213) 255-4165   |   El Segundo: (310) 527-6994

    By clicking submit, you are agreeing to the Disclaimer and Privacy Policy.

      Contact Us

      By clicking submit, you are agreeing to the Disclaimer and Privacy Policy.